The impact of submission timing on students’ final grades: Mindset as an academic predictor

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35564/jmbe.2026.0005

Keywords:

fixed mindset, growth mindset, response time, behavior pattern, educational system

Abstract

The time students take to submit their exam may influence their final grades, as it reflects not only their prior preparation but also their underlying behavioral profiles. In this regard, literature highlights the role of mindset in shaping how individuals approach tasks. Students with a fixed mindset tend to exhibit slower responses due to fear of failure and avoidance of challenges, often delaying task completion and the moment of submission. In contrast, those with a growth mindset are more proactive, persistent, and focused on improvement, which may lead to faster and more efficient execution. In the world population, there is a predominance of people with a fixed mindset. Consistent with this, our data show that a majority of students submit their exams in the final time slots of the exam (around 60% of students). Likewise, both high- and low-performing students can hold either type of mindset, implying that high academic performers may deliver in the first time slots (when holding a growth mindset) and in the last ones (when holding a fixed mindset). Supporting this idea, our analysis reveals that the highest average grades are achieved both in the earliest (+12%) and latest (+4%) submission slots, whereas the lowest performance is observed in intermediate periods, following a U-shaped relationship. To deepen the analysis, we also examine the behavior followed by the 'top 10’ best and 'top 10’ worst students in the class. Consistent with prior general submission pattern, both groups are mainly present in the final time slot. Therefore, it could be argued that students who take more time to complete their exams tend to obtain both the highest but also the lowest results of the class. Overall, our findings highlight the relevance of understanding submission patterns for educators, as they can better interpret students’ needs during exams, anticipate peak workloads to increase invigilation, and avoid misinterpreting early or late submissions from potential high-performing students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, I., Hamid, K., & Khan, M. A. (2010). A study of university students' motivation and its relationship with their academic performance. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(4), 80-88. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2899435

Brooks, C., & Williams, L. (2023). People are people: A comparative analysis of risk attitudes across Europe. International Journal of Finance & Economics. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2837

Burgoyne, A. P., & Macnamara, B. N. (2021). Reconsidering the use of the mindset assessment profile in educational contexts. Journal of Intelligence, 9(3), 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence9030039

Claessens, B. J. C., Van Eerde, W., Rutte, C. G., & Roe, R. A. (2007). A review of the time management literature. Personnel Review, 36(2), 255-276. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480710726136

Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Crisp, B. R. (2007). Is it worth the effort? How feedback influences students’ subsequent submission of assessable work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32, 571-581. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930601116912

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7

Dev, P. C. (1997). Intrinsic motivation and academic achievement: What does their relationship imply for the classroom teacher? Remedial and Special Education, 18(1), 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193259701800104

Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. New York, NY: Random House. https://www.amazon.com/Mindset-Psychology-Carol-S-Dweck/dp/0345472322

Dweck, C. S., & Legget, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95 (2): 256-273. https://10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.256

Dweck C. S., & Yeager D. (2021). Global mindset initiative introduction: Envisioning the future of growth mindset research in education. SSRN Electronic Journal. Austin. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3911564

Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218-232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.218

Escribá-Esteve, A., Avenza, M., González, P., Llinares, L., Sánchez-Peinado, E., & Villagrasa, J. (2023). Percepción del alumnado universitario sobre el atractivo de las alternativas laborales. Cátedra de Empresa Familiar de la Universitat de València. https://www.uv.es/cef/libros/PI_Percepciones_Alumnado_EF.pdf

Ferrari, J. R., Johnson, J. L., & McCown, W. G. (1995). Procrastination and task avoidance: Theory, research, and treatment. New York, NY: Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0227-6

Heffernan, T. (2022). Sexism, racism, prejudice, and bias: A literature review and synthesis of research surrounding student evaluations of courses and teaching. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(1), 144-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1888075

Huitt, W. (2001). Motivation to learn: An overview. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University. Retrieved from http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/motivation/motivate.html [accedido el 20 de julio de 2024]

Hutton, J. S., Dudley, J., Horowitz-Kraus, T., DeWitt, T., & Holland, S. K. (2020). Associations between screen-based media use and brain white matter integrity in preschool-aged children. JAMA Pediatrics, 174(1), e193869-e193869. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.3869

Izagirre-Olaizola, J., Morandeira-Arca, J., Mitxeo-Grajirena, J., Mendizabal-Zubeldia, A., & Lertxundi-Lertxundi, A. (2020). Reinforcing the involvement of students in learning business economics through active methodologies and student response systems. Journal of Management and Business Education, 3(1), 29-46. https://doi.org/10.35564/jmbe.2020.0004

Jami, H., & Afzal, S. (2018). Prevalence of Academic Procrastination and Reasons for Academic Procrastination in University Students. Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 28(1). http://pu.edu.pk/images/journal/doap/PDF-FILES/04_v28_1_18.pdf

Kalinowski, S., & Toper, M. L. (2007). The Effect of Seat Location on Exam Grades and Student Perceptions in an Introductory Biology Class. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(4). https://www.montana.edu/kalinowski/documents/2007_Seat_location_JCST.pdf

Kroeper, K. M., Fried, A. C., & Murphy, M. C. (2022). Towards fostering growth mindset classrooms: Identifying teaching behaviors that signal instructors’ fixed and growth mindsets beliefs to students. Social Psychology of Education, 25(2), 371-398. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/8hpyu

Macan, T. H., Shahani, C., Dipboye, R. L., & Phillips, A. P. (1990). College students’ time management: Correlations with academic performance and stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 760-768. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.760

Mofield, E. L., & Parker-Peters, M. (2018). Mindset misconception? Comparing mindsets, perfectionism, and attitudes of achievement in gifted, advanced, and typical students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(4), 327-349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986218758440

Orosz, G., Péter-Szarka, S., Bőthe, B., Tóth-Király, I., & Berger, R. (2017). How not to do a mindset intervention: Learning from a mindset intervention among students with good grades. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1-11. https://doi.org/10. 3389/fpsyg.2017.00311

Pinar-Pérez, J. M., Morales-Arsenal, R., Fernandez-Moya, M., Cuadros-Solas, P., & Salvador, C. (2021). Mitigating deficiencies of generation Z through new educational methodologies in a business statistic course. In Proceedings INNODOCT/20. International Conference on Innovation, Documentation and Education, pp. 81-88. https://doi.org/10.4995/INN2020.2020.11821

Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., MacCallum, R. C., & Nicewander, W. A. (2005). Use of the extreme groups approach: A critical reexamination and new recommendations. Psychological Methods, 10(2), 178-192. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.10.2.178

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020

Santos, J. M., Ortiz, E., & Marín, S. (2018). Variation indexes of marks due to continuous assessment. Empirical approach at university. Cultura y Educacion, 30(3), 491–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2018.1488422

Steel, P. (2007). The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 65-94. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.65

Villagrasa, J., Buyl, T., & Escribá-Esteve, A. (2018). CEO satisfaction and intended strategic changes: The moderating role of performance cues. Long Range Planning, 51(6), 894-910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.12.002

Villagrasa, J., Donaldson, C., & Soler, A. (2024a). Grades for glory? The impact of grade appeasement on business school teacher evaluations. Journal of Management and Business Education, 7(2), 303-323. https://doi.org/10.35564/jmbe.2024.0017

Villagrasa, J., Escribá-Esteve, A., & Donaldson, C. (2024b). How can complacency mold managerial decisions? The role of perceptions in strategic decision-making. Corporate Governance and Organizational Behavior Review, 8(2), 212-231. https://doi.org/10.22495/cgobrv8i2p21

Zamarro, G., Hitt, C., & Mendez, I. (2016). When Students Don't Care: Reexamining International Differences in Achievement and Non-Cognitive Skills. EDRE Working Paper, 2016-18 http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2857243

Journal of Management and Business Economics

Downloads

Published

2026-04-12

How to Cite

Villagrasa, J., Donaldson, C., Avenza-Ivars, M., & Sánchez-Coll, F. (2026). The impact of submission timing on students’ final grades: Mindset as an academic predictor. Journal of Management and Business Education, 9(1), 104–124. https://doi.org/10.35564/jmbe.2026.0005

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.