Navegando el panorama académico: comprendiendo la dinámica universitaria, los desafíos y las respuestas estratégicas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35564/jmbe.2025.0010Palabras clave:
democratización, Estrategia universitaria, producción académica, investigación inductiva, limitaciones financieras, estructura organizacionalResumen
Este estudio investiga los desafíos estructurales y estratégicos en la gobernanza universitaria, enfocándose en el equilibrio entre la autonomía institucional y la rendición de cuentas externa. Utilizando un enfoque cualitativo inductivo basado en el análisis de datos secundarios y en observaciones reflexivas de una carrera académica, la metodología incluyó codificación temática para identificar patrones en la gobernanza universitaria, la diferenciación de roles y la influencia externa. Los hallazgos clave revelan una tensión entre la autonomía y el control ejercido por entidades gubernamentales y de financiamiento, divisiones internas entre el cuerpo docente y la administración, y un sistema de reconocimiento jerárquico que prioriza los roles de investigación sobre los roles centrados en la docencia. Estas dinámicas contribuyen a una fragmentación interna que afecta la moral y la colaboración. Las implicaciones destacan la necesidad de modelos de gobernanza que valoren diversas contribuciones, promuevan la comunicación interfuncional y mejoren la adaptabilidad. Las limitaciones incluyen la dependencia de datos secundarios y la falta de entrevistas directas, lo cual indica la necesidad de más investigación sobre modelos de gobernanza y estrategias de compromiso del profesorado. Este estudio ofrece ideas para universidades que buscan navegar en entornos educativos complejos mientras fomentan la cohesión y la adaptabilidad estratégica.
Referencias
Abbott, A. (2002). The disciplines and the future. The Future of the City of Intellect: The Changing American University, 205–230. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804779166-012
Altbach, P. G. (2016). Global perspectives on higher education. Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore. https://brill.com/downloadpdf/edcollbook/title/58971.pdf
Altbach, P. G., & Knight, J. (2007). The Internationalization of Higher Education: Motivations and Realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3–4), 290–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315307303542
Altbach, P. G., & Mathews, E. (2019). Why India Will Fail to Attract Global Faculty. International Higher Education, 99, 17–18.
Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2019). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution (Vol. 22). Brill. https://books.google.fr/books?hl=fr&lr=&id=-t-mDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP3&ots=rHE10fhImN&sig=UXnK0DsDBLyILP3-6dEFb1W6Yl0
Amaral, A., & Magalhães, A. M. (2023). Introduction to the handbook on higher education management and governance. Handbook on Higher Education Management and Governance. https://books.google.com/books?hl=fr&lr=&id=62DdEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=Amaral++Magalh%C3%A3es,+2018+university&ots=cmSxibRi7l&sig=ov6FoFLTP5NI_BAxeK7wv8f6laE
Antonowicz, D. (2013). External influences and local responses. Leadership and Governance in Higher Education. Handbook for Decision-Makers and Administrators, 3, 59–77.
Argyris, C. (1993). Knowledge for action: A guide to overcoming barriers to organizational change. Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers, 350 Sansome Street, San Francisco, CA 94104.
Arocena, R., Göransson, B., & Sutz, J. (2018). Developmental Universities in Inclusive Innovation Systems. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64152-2
Bailey, R. W. (2008). Is the university in ruins? IEDP Discussion Paper Series. http://epapers.bham.ac.uk/42/1/2008-02.pdf
Bastedo, M. N., Altbach, P. G., & Gumport, P. J. (2016). American higher education in the twenty-first century: Social, political, and economic challenges. JHU Press.
Biondi, L., & Russo, S. (2022). Integrating strategic planning and performance management in universities: A multiple case-study analysis. Journal of Management and Governance, 26(2), 417–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-022-09628-7
Birnbaum, R. (1989). The cybernetic institution: Toward an integration of governance theories. Higher Education, 18(2), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139183
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Boyce, M. E. (2003). Organizational Learning Is Essential to Achieving and Sustaining Change in Higher Education. Innovative Higher Education, 28(2), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IHIE.0000006287.69207.00
Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Campbell, W. H., Anderson, W. K., Burckart, G. J., Clark, A. M., DiGate, R. J., Lee, V. H., Rogers, M. E., & Miller, K. W. (2002). Institutional and faculty roles and responsibilities in the emerging environment of university-wide interdisciplinary research structures: Report of the 2001-2002 Research and Graduate Affairs Committee. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 66(4), 28S.
Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the industrial empire. Cambridge Mass. https://www.academia.edu/download/57543425/Chandler_Stategy_and_Structure_Summary.pdf
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. sage.
Charmaz, K., & Thornberg, R. (2021). The pursuit of quality in grounded theory. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1780357
Cheng, M., Shen, Q., & Cai, S. (2024). Identity transformation in a cross-departmental teaching community: Experiences of academics at a research-intensive university in China. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2024.2398305
Clark, B. R. (1983). The contradictions of change in academic systems. Higher Education, 12(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00140275
Clark, B. R. (1987). The academic profession: National, disciplinary, and institutional settings. Univ of California Press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=fr&lr=&id=3GO_eXnNj6kC&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=Clark,+B.+R.+1987).+&ots=7Rl4_-sy14&sig=gdQPVV85NX5_3EcJKhSuDyBrCxg
Clark, B. R. (1998). The entrepreneurial university: Demand and response 1. Tertiary Education and Management, 4(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.1998.9966941
Coghlan, D. (2019). Doing Action Research in Your Own Organization (5e édition). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Compagnucci, L., & Spigarelli, F. (2020). The Third Mission of the university: A systematic literature review on potentials and constraints. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120284
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (4e édition). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Corrado, C., Hulten, C., & Sichel, D. (2009). INTANGIBLE CAPITAL AND U.S. ECONOMIC GROWTH. Review of Income and Wealth, 55(3), 661–685. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2009.00343.x
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2024). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (5e édition). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Deem, R., Hillyard, S., Reed, M., & Reed, M. (2007). Knowledge, higher education, and the new managerialism: The changing management of UK universities. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199265909.001.0001
Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S., Giardina, M. D., & Cannella, G. S. (2023). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (6e édition). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Drucker, P. F. (1976). People and performance: The best of Peter Drucker on management. (No Title). https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130282272525429376
Drucker, P. F. (1993). The rise of the knowledge society. The Wilson Quarterly, 17(2), 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-0921-0.50006-9
Drucker, P. F. (2018). The new productivity challenge. In Quality in Higher Education (pp. 37–46). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351293563-2
Egitim, S. (2022). Challenges of adapting to organizational culture: Internationalization through inclusive leadership and mutuality. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 5(1), 100242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100242
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
Etzkowitz, H., & Zhou, C. (2018). Innovation incommensurability and the science park. R&D Management, 48(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12266
Faraoni, N., Luque-Martínez, T., & Doña-Toledo, L. (2024). Analysis of university online reputation-visibility. The case of Spanish public universities. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2024.2301777
Filatotchev, I., Ireland, R. D., & Stahl, G. K. (2022). Contextualizing Management Research: An Open Systems Perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 59(4), 1036–1056. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12754
Finlay, L. (2002). “Outing” the Researcher: The Provenance, Process, and Practice of Reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 531–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973202129120052
Foos, T., Schum, G., & Rothenberg, S. (2006). Tacit knowledge transfer and the knowledge disconnect. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(1), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270610650067
Galbraith, J. K. (2007). The new industrial state (Vol. 9). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400873180
Godbold, N., Matthews, K. E. E., & Gannaway, D. (2024). Theorising new possibilities for Scholarship of Teaching and Learning and teaching-focused academics. Higher Education Research & Development, 43(1), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2218809
Graham, S. W., & Donaldson, J. F. (2020). Academic leaders’ response to the volatility of higher education: The influence of institutional logics. Studies in Higher Education, 45(9), 1864–1877. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1586867
Hammoda, B. (2023). Extracurricular Activities for Entrepreneurial Learning: A Typology Based on Learning Theories. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 25151274231218212. https://doi.org/10.1177/25151274231218212
Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 149–164. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095567
Haskel, J., & Westlake, S. (2022). Restarting the future: How to fix the intangible economy. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691236025
Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., De Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 429–431. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a
Hossain, M. I., Tabash, M. I., Siow, M. L., Ong, T. S., & Anagreh, S. (2023). Entrepreneurial intentions of Gen Z university students and entrepreneurial constraints in Bangladesh. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-023-00279-y
Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
Jayabalan, J., Dorasamy, M., & Raman, M. (2021). Reshaping higher educational institutions through frugal open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(2), 145. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7020145
Johnstone, D. B. (2004). The economics and politics of cost sharing in higher education: Comparative perspectives. Economics of Education Review, 23(4), 403–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2003.09.004
Jongbloed, B. (2015). Universities as hybrid organizations: Trends, drivers, and challenges for the European university. International Studies of Management & Organization, 45(3), 207-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2015.1006027
Kaman, Z., & Othman, Z. (2016). Validity, reliability and triangulation in case study method: An experience. Qualitative Research Conference (QRC), 2016, 24–26. https://qualitative-research-conference.com/download/proceedings-2016/88-zettiey%20350-356.pdf
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). Introducing Critical Participatory Action Research. In S. Kemmis, R. McTaggart, & R. Nixon, The Action Research Planner (pp. 1–31). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2_1
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2
Kezar, A., & Eckel, P. D. (2004). Meeting Today’s Governance Challenges: A Synthesis of the Literature and Examination of a Future Agenda for Scholarship. The Journal of Higher Education, 75(4), 371–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2004.11772264
King, D. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430(6997), 311–316. https://doi.org/10.1038/430311a
Kocatürk, H. E., & Karadağ, E. (2021). Organizational functioning in Turkish higher education system: Birnbaum’s five models of institutional governance. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(4), 230–250. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2021474637
Kuo, H. M. (2009). Understanding relationships between academic staff and administrators: An organisational culture perspective. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 31(1), 43-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800802559278
Labaree, D. F. (2020). A perfect mess: The unlikely ascendancy of American higher education. University of Chicago Press.
Larivière, V., Haustein, S., & Mongeon, P. (2015). The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PloS One, 10(6), e0127502. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502
Maak, T., & Pless, N. M. (2006). Responsible Leadership in a Stakeholder Society – A Relational Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9047-z
Magalhães, A., Veiga, A., & Amaral, A. (2018). The changing role of external stakeholders: From imaginary friends to effective actors or non-interfering friends. Studies in Higher Education, 43(4), 737–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1196354
Marginson, S. (2016). The worldwide trend to high participation higher education: Dynamics of social stratification in inclusive systems. Higher Education, 72(4), 413–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0016-x
Marginson, S. (2024). Higher education and public and common good. Centre for Global Higher Education, University of Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01339-2
Marien, M. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. Cadmus, 2(2), 174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1946756714541404
Martin, J., & Samels, J. E. (2009). Turnaround: Leading stressed colleges and universities to excellence. JHU Press.
Mathies, C., & Ferland, C. (2022). Institutional Strategic Planning: Aligning Strategy with Mission and Goals. In Organization and Administration in Higher Education (pp. 91-113). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003272908-7
McAfee, A., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2016). Human work in the robotic future: Policy for the age of automation. Foreign Affairs, 95(4), 139–150.
Menon, S., & Suresh, M. (2021). Factors influencing organizational agility in higher education. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 28(1), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-04-2020-0151
Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. Simon and Schuster.
Meydan, C. H., & Akkaş, H. (2024). The Role of Triangulation in Qualitative Research: Converging Perspectives. In Principles of Conducting Qualitative Research in Multicultural Settings (pp. 98–129). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3306-8.ch006
Millones-Gómez, P. A., Yangali-Vicente, J. S., Arispe-Alburqueque, C. M., Rivera-Lozada, O., Calla-Vásquez, K. M., Calla-Poma, R. D., ... & Minchón-Medina, C. A. (2021). Research policies and scientific production: A study of 94 Peruvian universities. PloS one, 16(5), e0252410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252410
Mintzberg, H. (1979). An emerging strategy of" direct" research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 582–589. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392364
Mintzberg, H. (1989). The Structuring of Organizations. In D. Asch & C. Bowman (Eds.), Readings in Strategic Management (pp. 322–352). Macmillan Education UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20317-8_23
Molas-Gallart, J. (2012). Research Governance and the Role of Evaluation: A Comparative Study. American Journal of Evaluation, 33(4), 583–598. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214012450938
Muyters, G., Broucker, B., & De Witte, K. (2022). On higher education’s complexities and the potential of network governance. A case study. International Journal of Public Administration, 45(2), 198-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.2003813
Nijkamp, S. (2024). Voices in academia: A qualitative study on organizational culture, community, and strategic dynamics through internal communication. [Master’s Thesis, University of Twente]. http://essay.utwente.nl/104411/
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (2007). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review, 85(7/8), 162.
Nuñez, R. (2021). One University: An Interdepartmental Collaboration Model to Enhance Online Student Engagement. In International Perspectives on Supporting and Engaging Online Learners (pp. 105–118). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-364120210000039008
Orb, A., Eisenhauer, L., & Wynaden, D. (2001). Ethics in Qualitative Research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(1), 93–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00093.x
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications. https://books.google.fr/books?hl=fr&lr=&id=-CM9BQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT14&dq=Patton,+M.+Q.++Qualitative+Research+and+Evaluation+Methods++Sage.&ots=IFCvr4oHVl&sig=K3-vEEp8r1HzGJbEjz67PKXuF9E
Perkin, H. (2014). History of universities. In International Higher Education Volume 1 (pp. 169–204). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203802748-10/history-universities-harold-perkin
Pinho, M., & Colston, B. (2024). Perceptions of fairness, inclusion and safety: the differential impact of contrasting experiences on academics and professional services staff. Journal of Management and Governance, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-024-09721-z
Reason, P., Bradbury, H., & Bradbury-Huang, H. (2013). The SAGE Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice (2e édition). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Rijcke, S. de, Wouters, P. F., Rushforth, A. D., Franssen, T. P., & Hammarfelt, B. (2016). Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—A literature review. Research Evaluation, 25(2), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv038
Salmi, J. (2009). The challenge of establishing world-class universities. World Bank Publications. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-7865-6
Schoen, S. F. (1983). The Status of Compliance Technology: Implications for Programming. The Journal of Special Education, 17(4), 483–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246698301700410
Scott, W. R. (2008). Approaching adulthood: The maturing of institutional theory. Theory and Society, 37(5), 427–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-008-9067-z
Selznick, P. (2020). Law, society, and industrial justice (Vol. 30). Quid Pro Books.
Si, J. (2024). Higher education teachers’ professional well-being in the rise of managerialism: Insights from China. Higher Education, 87(4), 1121–1138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01056-2
Stanley, C. A., & Algert, N. E. (2007). An exploratory study of the conflict management styles of department heads in a research university setting. Innovative Higher Education, 32, 49-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-007-9035-y
Stenvall-Virtanen, S. (2023). A Dialectical Perspective on an Institutional Change Process in Higher Education. Higher Education Policy. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-023-00327-y
Stephan, P. (2012). How Economics Shapes Science: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674062757
Strużyna, J., Marzec, I., & Bozionelos, N. (2021). Competency management in bureaucratic organizations: Evidence from the Polish public administration. European Management Review, 18(2), 43-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12437
Taylor, M. P. (2012). The entrepreneurial university in the twenty-first century. London Review of Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460.2012.729885
Teece, D. J. (2018). Managing the university: Why “organized anarchy” is unacceptable in the age of massive open online courses. Strategic Organization, 16(1), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127017732760
Teichler, U. (2017). Academic Profession, Higher Education. In J. C. Shin & P. Teixeira (Eds.), Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions (pp. 1–6). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_290-2
Thomas, D. R. (2006). A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
Trow, M. (2006). Reflections on the Transition from Elite to Mass to Universal Access: Forms and Phases of Higher Education in Modern Societies since WWII. In J. J. F. Forest & P. G. Altbach (Eds.), International Handbook of Higher Education (Vol. 18, pp. 243–280). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4012-2_13
Usman, M., & Ab Rahman, A. (2023). Funding higher education through waqf: a lesson from Malaysia. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 39(1), 107-125. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-12-2021-0217
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Journal of Management and Business Education
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
License terms at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode
