An online event as a product of the active learning methodology: an experience via pbl at the university of Brasilia-Brazil

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35564/jmbe.2018.0017

Keywords:

Active methodologies, PBL, Brazil, Event, Technology

Abstract

The objective of this study was to suggest an alternative for managing the knowledge gained and resulting legacy from the application of the Problem Based Learning (PBL) method in a higher education context. The legacies of the PBL method are found to be more profound and diverse than those related to either the students' experience or the projects developed to solve real-world problems presented by external agents (the partners of the UnB Production Engineering course). The Production Engineering course has, since 2011, adopted the PBL method as an active learning methodology. Although each semester presents new opportunities in the process of consolidating this method, it’s been perceived that the many phases and results of this process are often utilized in real time only, contributing to the participating individuals exclusively as they occur. This is seen as a type of temporal result, seen only at a given "T" moment in the discipline’s lifecycle. Correspondingly, part of this knowledge is currently seen as perishable, since it is not possible to store it for future moments. In an attempt to extend this experience, starting in 2016 the University of Brasilia’s Production Engineering course has begun to develop an extension of PBL products by means of distinct events. The results haven been satisfactory, thus far involving 458 students and 7910 participants. As a legacy, it was possible to create a platform for the presentation of active learning methodologies and the exchange of experiences. Thus, the project presentations, once seen as distinct landmarks, became part of a legacy through a specific event, assisted and accessed as a course memory and a student’s digital portfolio.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Angelo, M. F., & Bertoni, F. C. (2012). Análise da aplicação do método PBL no processo de ensino e aprendizagem em um curso de engenharia de computação. Revista de Ensino de Engenharia, 30(2), 35-42.

https://doi.org/10.15552/2236-0158/abenge.v30n2p35-42

Araujo, J. Fundamentos da metodologia de ensino ativa (1890-1931). 37ª Reunião Nacional da ANPEd. Anais...Florianópolis: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina-UFSC, 2016. Disponível em: <http://www.anped.org.br/sites/default/files/trabalho-gt02-4216.pdf>. Acesso em: 19 dez. 2016

AusubeL, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1980). Psicologia educacional. Interamericana.

Banchi, H., & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry. Science and children, 46(2), 26.

Blackburn, G. (2017). A university's strategic adoption process of an PBL-aligned eLearning environment: an exploratory case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(1), 147-176.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9472-3

Canton, M. (1997). Evento: da proposta ao planejamento. Revista Turismo em Análise, 8(1), 18-30.

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1984-4867.v8i1p18-30

Cunha, Gilberto Dias. (2002 Um panorama da engenharia de produção. [S.l.]: ABEPRO. Disponível em: http://www.abepro.org.br. Acesso em:XXX 2016.

de Oliveira, V. F., Borges, M. M., & Naveiro, R. M. (1998). The Improvement of the Learning Process of Basic Disciplines at the Engineering Design. Disponível em < https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED442624>, acesso em 10 de julho de 2017.

de Oliveira, V. F. (2005). A avaliação dos cursos de Engenharia de Produção. Revista Gestão Industrial, 1(03), 001-012.

https://doi.org/10.3895/S1808-04482005000300001

de Oliveira, V. F. (2008). Crescimento, evolução e o futuro dos cursos de engenharia. Revista de Ensino de Engenharia, 24(2).

https://doi.org/10.15552/2236-0158/abenge.v24n2p3-12

de Oliveira, V. F. (2010). Retrospecto sobre a Formação em Engenharia. Educação em Engenharia: evolução, bases e formatação. Juiz de Fora: Fórum Mineiro de Engenharia de Produção-FMEPRO.

de Oliveira, V. F., de Almeida, N. N., Carvalho, D. M., & Pereira, F. A. A. (2013). Um estudo sobre a expansão da formação em engenharia no Brasil. Revista de Ensino de Engenharia.

https://doi.org/10.15552/2236-0158/abenge.v32n3p37-56

Escrivão Filho, E., & Ribeiro, L. R. D. C. (2009). Aprendendo com PBL-Aprendizagem Baseada em Problemas: relato de uma experiência em cursos de engenharia da EESC-USP. Revista Minerva, 6(1), 23-30.

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-39512008000500004

Frezatti, F., & Da Silva, S. C. (2014). Prática versus incerteza: como gerenciar o estudante nessa tensão na implementação de disciplina sob o prisma do método pbl?. Revista Universo Contábil, 10(1), 28-46.

https://doi.org/10.4270/ruc.2014102

Frost, M. (1996). An analysis of the scope and value of problem‐based learning in the education of health care professionals. Journal of advanced nursing, 24(5), 1047-1053.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1996.tb02942.x

Günter, T., & Alpat, S. K. (2017). The effects of problem-based learning (PBL) on the academic achievement of students studying 'Electrochemistry'. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(1), 78-98.

https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00176A

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement Versus Traditional Methods: A Six-thousandstudent Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses. American Journal of Physics, v. 66, p. 64-74, 1998.

https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809

Helle, L., Tynjälä, P., & Olkinuora, E. (2006). Project-based learning in post-secondary education-theory, practice and rubber sling shots. Higher Education, 51(2), 287-314.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6386-5

Hoffman, K., Hosokawa, M., Blake Jr, R., Headrick, L., & Johnson, G. (2006). Problem-based learning outcomes: ten years of experience at the University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine. Academic Medicine, 81(7), 617-625.

https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ACM.0000232411.97399.c6

Monteiro, S. B. S., Souza, J., & Zindel, M. L. (2012). Metodologias e práticas de ensino aplicadas ao curso de engenharia de produção: análise da percepção de alunos de projetos de sistemas de produção da Universidade de Brasília. In Congresso Brasileiro de Ensino de Engenharia.

Moran, J. (2015). Mudando a educação com metodologias ativas. Coleção Mídias Contemporâneas. Convergências Midiáticas, Educação e Cidadania: aproximações jovens, 2.

Novak, G., & Middendorf, J. (2004). Just-in-Time Teaching In: Volume IV-What Works, What Matters, What Lasts.

PMBOK, G. (2013). Um guia do conhecimento em gerenciamento de projetos.

Santos, A., Salgado, A., Barreto, J. F., Martins, H., & Dores, A. R. (2010). Problem-Based Learning e suas implicações: Breve revisão teórica. In I Congresso Internacional da Saúde Gaia-Porto. Instituto Politécnico do Porto. Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde do Porto-Politema.

Smith, B. L., & MacGregor, J. T. (1992). What is collaborative learning. In B.F. Nicolae Nistor, Lyn English, Steve Wheeler (Ed.), Towards the Virtual University: International On-line Learning Perspectives. 219-303.

Zhou, J., Zhou, S., Huang, C., Xu, R., Zhang, Z., Zeng, S., & Qian, G. (2016). Effectiveness of problem-based learning in Chinese pharmacy education: a meta-analysis. BMC medical education, 16(1), 23.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0546-z

Downloads

Published

2018-12-01

How to Cite

Mariano, A. M., Mello , J. ., Monteiro, S. B. S. ., & Martin, A. R. . (2018). An online event as a product of the active learning methodology: an experience via pbl at the university of Brasilia-Brazil. Journal of Management and Business Education, 1(3), 240–257. https://doi.org/10.35564/jmbe.2018.0017

Issue

Section

Articles