Navigating the academic landscape: understanding university dynamics, challenges, and strategic responses

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35564/jmbe.2025.0010

Keywords:

University strategy, stakeholder-centric models, democratization, excellence, scholarly output, organizational structure, recognition disparities, governance models, inductive research, financial constraints

Abstract

This study investigates the structural and strategic challenges in university governance, focusing on the balance between institutional autonomy and external accountability. Using an inductive, qualitative approach grounded in secondary data analysis and reflective observations from an academic career, the methodology involved thematic coding to identify patterns in university governance, role differentiation, and external influence. Key findings reveal a tension between autonomy and control by government and funding bodies, internal divisions between faculty and administration, and a hierarchical recognition system that prioritizes research roles over teaching-focused ones. These dynamics contribute to internal fragmentation, affecting morale and collaboration. Implications highlight the need for governance models that value diverse contributions, promote cross-functional communication, and enhance adaptability. Limitations include reliance on secondary data and lack of direct interviews, pointing to the need for further research on governance models and faculty engagement. This study provides insights for universities navigating complex educational landscapes while fostering cohesion and strategic adaptability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbott, A. (2002). The disciplines and the future. The Future of the City of Intellect: The Changing American University, 205–230. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804779166-012

Altbach, P. G. (2016). Global perspectives on higher education. Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore. https://brill.com/downloadpdf/edcollbook/title/58971.pdf

Altbach, P. G., & Knight, J. (2007). The Internationalization of Higher Education: Motivations and Realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3–4), 290–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315307303542

Altbach, P. G., & Mathews, E. (2019). Why India Will Fail to Attract Global Faculty. International Higher Education, 99, 17–18.

Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2019). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution (Vol. 22). Brill. https://books.google.fr/books?hl=fr&lr=&id=-t-mDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP3&ots=rHE10fhImN&sig=UXnK0DsDBLyILP3-6dEFb1W6Yl0

Amaral, A., & Magalhães, A. M. (2023). Introduction to the handbook on higher education management and governance. Handbook on Higher Education Management and Governance. https://books.google.com/books?hl=fr&lr=&id=62DdEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=Amaral++Magalh%C3%A3es,+2018+university&ots=cmSxibRi7l&sig=ov6FoFLTP5NI_BAxeK7wv8f6laE

Antonowicz, D. (2013). External influences and local responses. Leadership and Governance in Higher Education. Handbook for Decision-Makers and Administrators, 3, 59–77.

Argyris, C. (1993). Knowledge for action: A guide to overcoming barriers to organizational change. Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers, 350 Sansome Street, San Francisco, CA 94104.

Arocena, R., Göransson, B., & Sutz, J. (2018). Developmental Universities in Inclusive Innovation Systems. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64152-2

Bailey, R. W. (2008). Is the university in ruins? IEDP Discussion Paper Series. http://epapers.bham.ac.uk/42/1/2008-02.pdf

Bastedo, M. N., Altbach, P. G., & Gumport, P. J. (2016). American higher education in the twenty-first century: Social, political, and economic challenges. JHU Press.

Biondi, L., & Russo, S. (2022). Integrating strategic planning and performance management in universities: A multiple case-study analysis. Journal of Management and Governance, 26(2), 417–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-022-09628-7

Birnbaum, R. (1989). The cybernetic institution: Toward an integration of governance theories. Higher Education, 18(2), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139183

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Boyce, M. E. (2003). Organizational Learning Is Essential to Achieving and Sustaining Change in Higher Education. Innovative Higher Education, 28(2), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IHIE.0000006287.69207.00

Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Campbell, W. H., Anderson, W. K., Burckart, G. J., Clark, A. M., DiGate, R. J., Lee, V. H., Rogers, M. E., & Miller, K. W. (2002). Institutional and faculty roles and responsibilities in the emerging environment of university-wide interdisciplinary research structures: Report of the 2001-2002 Research and Graduate Affairs Committee. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 66(4), 28S.

Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the industrial empire. Cambridge Mass. https://www.academia.edu/download/57543425/Chandler_Stategy_and_Structure_Summary.pdf

Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. sage.

Charmaz, K., & Thornberg, R. (2021). The pursuit of quality in grounded theory. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1780357

Cheng, M., Shen, Q., & Cai, S. (2024). Identity transformation in a cross-departmental teaching community: Experiences of academics at a research-intensive university in China. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2024.2398305

Clark, B. R. (1983). The contradictions of change in academic systems. Higher Education, 12(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00140275

Clark, B. R. (1987). The academic profession: National, disciplinary, and institutional settings. Univ of California Press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=fr&lr=&id=3GO_eXnNj6kC&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=Clark,+B.+R.+1987).+&ots=7Rl4_-sy14&sig=gdQPVV85NX5_3EcJKhSuDyBrCxg

Clark, B. R. (1998). The entrepreneurial university: Demand and response 1. Tertiary Education and Management, 4(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.1998.9966941

Coghlan, D. (2019). Doing Action Research in Your Own Organization (5e édition). SAGE Publications Ltd.

Compagnucci, L., & Spigarelli, F. (2020). The Third Mission of the university: A systematic literature review on potentials and constraints. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120284

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (4e édition). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Corrado, C., Hulten, C., & Sichel, D. (2009). INTANGIBLE CAPITAL AND U.S. ECONOMIC GROWTH. Review of Income and Wealth, 55(3), 661–685. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2009.00343.x

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2024). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (5e édition). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Deem, R., Hillyard, S., Reed, M., & Reed, M. (2007). Knowledge, higher education, and the new managerialism: The changing management of UK universities. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199265909.001.0001

Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S., Giardina, M. D., & Cannella, G. S. (2023). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (6e édition). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Drucker, P. F. (1976). People and performance: The best of Peter Drucker on management. (No Title). https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130282272525429376

Drucker, P. F. (1993). The rise of the knowledge society. The Wilson Quarterly, 17(2), 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-0921-0.50006-9

Drucker, P. F. (2018). The new productivity challenge. In Quality in Higher Education (pp. 37–46). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351293563-2

Egitim, S. (2022). Challenges of adapting to organizational culture: Internationalization through inclusive leadership and mutuality. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 5(1), 100242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100242

Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4

Etzkowitz, H., & Zhou, C. (2018). Innovation incommensurability and the science park. R&D Management, 48(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12266

Faraoni, N., Luque-Martínez, T., & Doña-Toledo, L. (2024). Analysis of university online reputation-visibility. The case of Spanish public universities. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2024.2301777

Filatotchev, I., Ireland, R. D., & Stahl, G. K. (2022). Contextualizing Management Research: An Open Systems Perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 59(4), 1036–1056. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12754

Finlay, L. (2002). “Outing” the Researcher: The Provenance, Process, and Practice of Reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 531–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973202129120052

Foos, T., Schum, G., & Rothenberg, S. (2006). Tacit knowledge transfer and the knowledge disconnect. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(1), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270610650067

Galbraith, J. K. (2007). The new industrial state (Vol. 9). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400873180

Godbold, N., Matthews, K. E. E., & Gannaway, D. (2024). Theorising new possibilities for Scholarship of Teaching and Learning and teaching-focused academics. Higher Education Research & Development, 43(1), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2218809

Graham, S. W., & Donaldson, J. F. (2020). Academic leaders’ response to the volatility of higher education: The influence of institutional logics. Studies in Higher Education, 45(9), 1864–1877. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1586867

Hammoda, B. (2023). Extracurricular Activities for Entrepreneurial Learning: A Typology Based on Learning Theories. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 25151274231218212. https://doi.org/10.1177/25151274231218212

Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 149–164. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095567

Haskel, J., & Westlake, S. (2022). Restarting the future: How to fix the intangible economy. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691236025

Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., De Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 429–431. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a

Hossain, M. I., Tabash, M. I., Siow, M. L., Ong, T. S., & Anagreh, S. (2023). Entrepreneurial intentions of Gen Z university students and entrepreneurial constraints in Bangladesh. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-023-00279-y

Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124

Jayabalan, J., Dorasamy, M., & Raman, M. (2021). Reshaping higher educational institutions through frugal open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(2), 145. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7020145

Johnstone, D. B. (2004). The economics and politics of cost sharing in higher education: Comparative perspectives. Economics of Education Review, 23(4), 403–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2003.09.004

Jongbloed, B. (2015). Universities as hybrid organizations: Trends, drivers, and challenges for the European university. International Studies of Management & Organization, 45(3), 207-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2015.1006027

Kaman, Z., & Othman, Z. (2016). Validity, reliability and triangulation in case study method: An experience. Qualitative Research Conference (QRC), 2016, 24–26. https://qualitative-research-conference.com/download/proceedings-2016/88-zettiey%20350-356.pdf

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). Introducing Critical Participatory Action Research. In S. Kemmis, R. McTaggart, & R. Nixon, The Action Research Planner (pp. 1–31). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2_1

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2

Kezar, A., & Eckel, P. D. (2004). Meeting Today’s Governance Challenges: A Synthesis of the Literature and Examination of a Future Agenda for Scholarship. The Journal of Higher Education, 75(4), 371–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2004.11772264

King, D. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430(6997), 311–316. https://doi.org/10.1038/430311a

Kocatürk, H. E., & Karadağ, E. (2021). Organizational functioning in Turkish higher education system: Birnbaum’s five models of institutional governance. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(4), 230–250. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2021474637

Kuo, H. M. (2009). Understanding relationships between academic staff and administrators: An organisational culture perspective. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 31(1), 43-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800802559278

Labaree, D. F. (2020). A perfect mess: The unlikely ascendancy of American higher education. University of Chicago Press.

Larivière, V., Haustein, S., & Mongeon, P. (2015). The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PloS One, 10(6), e0127502. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502

Maak, T., & Pless, N. M. (2006). Responsible Leadership in a Stakeholder Society – A Relational Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9047-z

Magalhães, A., Veiga, A., & Amaral, A. (2018). The changing role of external stakeholders: From imaginary friends to effective actors or non-interfering friends. Studies in Higher Education, 43(4), 737–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1196354

Marginson, S. (2016). The worldwide trend to high participation higher education: Dynamics of social stratification in inclusive systems. Higher Education, 72(4), 413–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0016-x

Marginson, S. (2024). Higher education and public and common good. Centre for Global Higher Education, University of Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01339-2

Marien, M. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. Cadmus, 2(2), 174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1946756714541404

Martin, J., & Samels, J. E. (2009). Turnaround: Leading stressed colleges and universities to excellence. JHU Press.

Mathies, C., & Ferland, C. (2022). Institutional Strategic Planning: Aligning Strategy with Mission and Goals. In Organization and Administration in Higher Education (pp. 91-113). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003272908-7

McAfee, A., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2016). Human work in the robotic future: Policy for the age of automation. Foreign Affairs, 95(4), 139–150.

Menon, S., & Suresh, M. (2021). Factors influencing organizational agility in higher education. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 28(1), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-04-2020-0151

Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. Simon and Schuster.

Meydan, C. H., & Akkaş, H. (2024). The Role of Triangulation in Qualitative Research: Converging Perspectives. In Principles of Conducting Qualitative Research in Multicultural Settings (pp. 98–129). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3306-8.ch006

Millones-Gómez, P. A., Yangali-Vicente, J. S., Arispe-Alburqueque, C. M., Rivera-Lozada, O., Calla-Vásquez, K. M., Calla-Poma, R. D., ... & Minchón-Medina, C. A. (2021). Research policies and scientific production: A study of 94 Peruvian universities. PloS one, 16(5), e0252410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252410

Mintzberg, H. (1979). An emerging strategy of" direct" research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 582–589. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392364

Mintzberg, H. (1989). The Structuring of Organizations. In D. Asch & C. Bowman (Eds.), Readings in Strategic Management (pp. 322–352). Macmillan Education UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20317-8_23

Molas-Gallart, J. (2012). Research Governance and the Role of Evaluation: A Comparative Study. American Journal of Evaluation, 33(4), 583–598. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214012450938

Muyters, G., Broucker, B., & De Witte, K. (2022). On higher education’s complexities and the potential of network governance. A case study. International Journal of Public Administration, 45(2), 198-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.2003813

Nijkamp, S. (2024). Voices in academia: A qualitative study on organizational culture, community, and strategic dynamics through internal communication. [Master’s Thesis, University of Twente]. http://essay.utwente.nl/104411/

Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (2007). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review, 85(7/8), 162.

Nuñez, R. (2021). One University: An Interdepartmental Collaboration Model to Enhance Online Student Engagement. In International Perspectives on Supporting and Engaging Online Learners (pp. 105–118). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-364120210000039008

Orb, A., Eisenhauer, L., & Wynaden, D. (2001). Ethics in Qualitative Research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(1), 93–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00093.x

Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications. https://books.google.fr/books?hl=fr&lr=&id=-CM9BQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT14&dq=Patton,+M.+Q.++Qualitative+Research+and+Evaluation+Methods++Sage.&ots=IFCvr4oHVl&sig=K3-vEEp8r1HzGJbEjz67PKXuF9E

Perkin, H. (2014). History of universities. In International Higher Education Volume 1 (pp. 169–204). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203802748-10/history-universities-harold-perkin

Pinho, M., & Colston, B. (2024). Perceptions of fairness, inclusion and safety: the differential impact of contrasting experiences on academics and professional services staff. Journal of Management and Governance, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-024-09721-z

Reason, P., Bradbury, H., & Bradbury-Huang, H. (2013). The SAGE Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice (2e édition). SAGE Publications Ltd.

Rijcke, S. de, Wouters, P. F., Rushforth, A. D., Franssen, T. P., & Hammarfelt, B. (2016). Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—A literature review. Research Evaluation, 25(2), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv038

Salmi, J. (2009). The challenge of establishing world-class universities. World Bank Publications. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-7865-6

Schoen, S. F. (1983). The Status of Compliance Technology: Implications for Programming. The Journal of Special Education, 17(4), 483–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246698301700410

Scott, W. R. (2008). Approaching adulthood: The maturing of institutional theory. Theory and Society, 37(5), 427–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-008-9067-z

Selznick, P. (2020). Law, society, and industrial justice (Vol. 30). Quid Pro Books.

Si, J. (2024). Higher education teachers’ professional well-being in the rise of managerialism: Insights from China. Higher Education, 87(4), 1121–1138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01056-2

Stanley, C. A., & Algert, N. E. (2007). An exploratory study of the conflict management styles of department heads in a research university setting. Innovative Higher Education, 32, 49-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-007-9035-y

Stenvall-Virtanen, S. (2023). A Dialectical Perspective on an Institutional Change Process in Higher Education. Higher Education Policy. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-023-00327-y

Stephan, P. (2012). How Economics Shapes Science: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674062757

Strużyna, J., Marzec, I., & Bozionelos, N. (2021). Competency management in bureaucratic organizations: Evidence from the Polish public administration. European Management Review, 18(2), 43-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12437

Taylor, M. P. (2012). The entrepreneurial university in the twenty-first century. London Review of Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460.2012.729885

Teece, D. J. (2018). Managing the university: Why “organized anarchy” is unacceptable in the age of massive open online courses. Strategic Organization, 16(1), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127017732760

Teichler, U. (2017). Academic Profession, Higher Education. In J. C. Shin & P. Teixeira (Eds.), Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions (pp. 1–6). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_290-2

Thomas, D. R. (2006). A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748

Trow, M. (2006). Reflections on the Transition from Elite to Mass to Universal Access: Forms and Phases of Higher Education in Modern Societies since WWII. In J. J. F. Forest & P. G. Altbach (Eds.), International Handbook of Higher Education (Vol. 18, pp. 243–280). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4012-2_13

Usman, M., & Ab Rahman, A. (2023). Funding higher education through waqf: a lesson from Malaysia. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 39(1), 107-125. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-12-2021-0217

the academic landscape

Downloads

Published

2025-05-29

How to Cite

Spalanzani, A., & Zouaghi, I. (2025). Navigating the academic landscape: understanding university dynamics, challenges, and strategic responses. Journal of Management and Business Education, 8(2), 168–195. https://doi.org/10.35564/jmbe.2025.0010

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.